North American Turbocoupe Organization



Upper limit of .48?
tr_guy79 Offline
Senior Member
#1
Not sure why, but the T3 I am using is a .48 hotside, and now I am wondering if it is even worth rebuilding?

What is the limit on the .48? Would seem to me it is not really an upgrade from the IHI. How hard is it to change over to the .68?

It spools nice and quick but it has got to be choking the top end A LOT!!!!
3rd Annual Philly Tri-State NATO Meet - http://natomessageboard.com/ultimatebb.p...p=1#000003

'87 - Range Roller 4* adv / 50 trim t04e / Ported E6 / Gutted Knifed intake / Stinger 3->2.5" / Adj. Cam Pulley / Warlboro 255

To Do: PIMP/MS2, FMIC, Bigger Inj
Reply

Pete D Offline
Administrator
#2
Go back to the IHI and then tell us it's not an upgrade. Big Grin

I went to a 0.48 and liked it. But I made a lot of other improvements at the same time so it's hard to sort out. I like the quick spool, but I never ran a 0.63 so I can't compare them. The 0.48 had better top end than the IHI.
Pete Dunham


Reply

tr_guy79 Offline
Senior Member
#3
Ok...

That's all I needed. Thanks Pete. It's been a while since I drove w/ the IHI (6 years), and guess my but forgot.
3rd Annual Philly Tri-State NATO Meet - http://natomessageboard.com/ultimatebb.p...p=1#000003

'87 - Range Roller 4* adv / 50 trim t04e / Ported E6 / Gutted Knifed intake / Stinger 3->2.5" / Adj. Cam Pulley / Warlboro 255

To Do: PIMP/MS2, FMIC, Bigger Inj
Reply

86 XR7 5spd Offline
Senior Member
#4
Quote:Originally posted by tr_guy79:
How hard is it to change over to the .68?
IF
the bolts holding the swingvalve come out w/o breaking

AND
the bolts holding the turb housing to teh center section come out w/o breaking

THEN
its pretty easy
David T
T5 / ported E3 / .63 / 35# / K&N
2.5" exhaust w/ cherry bomb
30+ mpg! 8.2 0-60, 16.4@88 1/4 (gTech)
Reply

tr_guy79 Offline
Senior Member
#5
I am aware of the bolts breaking holding the turbine housing to the center.... See my post in WTB
3rd Annual Philly Tri-State NATO Meet - http://natomessageboard.com/ultimatebb.p...p=1#000003

'87 - Range Roller 4* adv / 50 trim t04e / Ported E6 / Gutted Knifed intake / Stinger 3->2.5" / Adj. Cam Pulley / Warlboro 255

To Do: PIMP/MS2, FMIC, Bigger Inj
Reply

tr_guy79 Offline
Senior Member
#6
Also, the same wheel and downturn works?

I may be buying one from someone on here, and need to be sure it will work.

Thanks
3rd Annual Philly Tri-State NATO Meet - http://natomessageboard.com/ultimatebb.p...p=1#000003

'87 - Range Roller 4* adv / 50 trim t04e / Ported E6 / Gutted Knifed intake / Stinger 3->2.5" / Adj. Cam Pulley / Warlboro 255

To Do: PIMP/MS2, FMIC, Bigger Inj
Reply

Stinger Offline
Senior Member
#7
Yes, the housing is the only difference, same wheel/elbow.
www.Stinger-Performance.com

85 TC
85 SVO
86 SVO
87 Merkur
Reply

tr_guy79 Offline
Senior Member
#8
I did some reading on turbos and it seems that he difference is the internal volume of the housing. Basically, the exhaust flow better CFM, but at a lower velocity, which causes slower spool, but better flow for more top end power.

Is this correct?
3rd Annual Philly Tri-State NATO Meet - http://natomessageboard.com/ultimatebb.p...p=1#000003

'87 - Range Roller 4* adv / 50 trim t04e / Ported E6 / Gutted Knifed intake / Stinger 3->2.5" / Adj. Cam Pulley / Warlboro 255

To Do: PIMP/MS2, FMIC, Bigger Inj
Reply

86 XR7 5spd Offline
Senior Member
#9
yes
David T
T5 / ported E3 / .63 / 35# / K&N
2.5" exhaust w/ cherry bomb
30+ mpg! 8.2 0-60, 16.4@88 1/4 (gTech)
Reply

Stinger Offline
Senior Member
#10
It's been proven in this case to only delay spool up by 50-100rpm though which isn't even noticeable in the real world. The gain up top is certainly worth the slight loss of spool down low.
www.Stinger-Performance.com

85 TC
85 SVO
86 SVO
87 Merkur
Reply





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Theme © iAndrew 2018 - Software MyBB