#1 |
I've just completed a front brake upgrade, suspension rebuild on my '86. I'll give as much information as I can think of so someone might be able to comment on my problem.
NAPA reman rack (performance suspension) and power steering pump, Motorcraft outer tie rods, poly rack bushings, poly swaybar bushings, Prothane swaybar links, FMS M-3075-A A arms, '88 TC spindles, Mustang GT rotors, new bearings/seals, NAPA reman '88 TC calipers, NAPA flex hoses, KYB struts, and MMC caster/camber plates.
With the MMC plates I can only get 1 1/2 to 2 degrees of castor. I had to flip one of the plates, driver side, to get -1/2 deg camber.
According to MMC the plates should be good for up to 6 deg castor. The only thing I see as different as far as the suspension are the spindles and struts. Anyone know if the angle of the strut mounts on the spindles are the same between '86 and '88?
I did not observe any differences in my casual examination of the two spindles, likewise with the FMS A arms. Anyone with an idea of what's going on?
NAPA reman rack (performance suspension) and power steering pump, Motorcraft outer tie rods, poly rack bushings, poly swaybar bushings, Prothane swaybar links, FMS M-3075-A A arms, '88 TC spindles, Mustang GT rotors, new bearings/seals, NAPA reman '88 TC calipers, NAPA flex hoses, KYB struts, and MMC caster/camber plates.
With the MMC plates I can only get 1 1/2 to 2 degrees of castor. I had to flip one of the plates, driver side, to get -1/2 deg camber.
According to MMC the plates should be good for up to 6 deg castor. The only thing I see as different as far as the suspension are the spindles and struts. Anyone know if the angle of the strut mounts on the spindles are the same between '86 and '88?
I did not observe any differences in my casual examination of the two spindles, likewise with the FMS A arms. Anyone with an idea of what's going on?
Robert Camp
'86 Medium Regatta Blue TC, 5-speed, original owner.
'86 Medium Regatta Blue TC, 5-speed, original owner.